Someone might notice that I updated my links list today. (See far right column.) Among those links is now a link (how word-well-wielding is that?) to Thesaurus.com, which I reference multiple times an hour as I write.
I know that while penning my first draft, I should ignore my Inner Editor and worry about finding synonyms later, but I can't help myself. I think I'm addicted. And the Inner Editor is more than happy to supply me with synonymical drugs.
Anyway....I was just indulging my habit a few minutes ago by looking up another word for "relentless." Thesaurus.com gave me "ruthless." Which led me to the following musings:
Why isn't relentful the opposite of relentless?
Relentless is related to the verb relent.
If relentless and ruthless are basically interchangeable, why can one not make a verb out of ruthless?
As in:
1. I no longer felt relentless, so I relented.
2. I am begging you to relent!
1A. I no longer felt ruthless, so I ruthed.
2A. I am begging you to ruth!
I'm so glad to have gotten this off my chest. I'm going to go back to my story now.
Friday, March 07, 2008
linguistic amusement
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment